About this product

Product Identifiers

PublisherPolity Press

ISBN-100745621465

ISBN-139780745621463

eBay Product ID (ePID)2216821

Product Key Features

Number of Pages280 Pages

Publication NameRisk and Luck in Medical Ethics

LanguageEnglish

Publication Year2003

SubjectEthics, Decision-Making & Problem Solving, General, Curiosities & Wonders

TypeTextbook

AuthorDonna L. Dickenson

Subject AreaRéférence, Business & Economics, Psychology, Medical

FormatTrade Paperback

Dimensions

Item Height0.8 in

Item Weight14.7 Oz

Item Length9 in

Item Width6 in

Additional Product Features

Edition Number2

Intended AudienceScholarly & Professional

LCCN02-003389

Reviews"Although risk is widely discussed in the medical ethics literature, luck has been conspicuously absent. This book seeks to fill this void by drawing on the extensive treatments of luck by philosophers and applying them to issues in medicine and health care ...the book provides a useful framework for analyzing issues in medical ethics. "John R. Williams, The Heythop Journal"Dickenson's book is truly groundbreaking. By viewing issues of applied ethics through the unusual prism of moral luck, she throws an unexpected light on familiar themes in medical ethics, and by bringing the problem of moral luck into relatively unchartered areas, she goes some way in rectifying the neglect into which this important problem has fallen in recent years."Stuart Rennie, Ethical Perspectives, "Dickenson's book is truly groundbreaking. By viewing issues of applied ethics through the unusual prism of moral luck, she throws an unexpected light on familiar themes in medical ethics, and by bringing the problem of moral luck into relatively unchartered areas, she goes some way in rectifying the neglect into which this important problem has fallen in recent years." Stuart Rennie, Ethical Perspectives, & "Although risk is widely discussed in the medical ethics literature, luck has been conspicuously absent. This book seeks to fill this void by drawing on the extensive treatments of luck by philosophers and applying them to issues in medicine and health care...the book provides a useful framework for analyzing issues in medical ethics."John R. Williams, The Heythop Journal"Dickenson's book is truly groundbreaking. By viewing issues of applied ethics through the unusual prism of moral luck, she throws an unexpected light on familiar themes in medical ethics, and by bringing the problem of moral luck into relatively unchartered areas, she goes some way in rectifying the neglect into which this important problem has fallen in recent years."Stuart Rennie, Ethical Perspectives, "Although risk is widely discussed in the medical ethics literature, luck has been conspicuously absent. This book seeks to fill this void by drawing on the extensive treatments of luck by philosophers and applying them to issues in medicine and health care...the book provides a useful framework for analyzing issues in medical ethics."John R. Williams, The Heythop Journal"Dickenson's book is truly groundbreaking. By viewing issues of applied ethics through the unusual prism of moral luck, she throws an unexpected light on familiar themes in medical ethics, and by bringing the problem of moral luck into relatively unchartered areas, she goes some way in rectifying the neglect into which this important problem has fallen in recent years."Stuart Rennie, Ethical Perspectives, "Although risk is widely discussed in the medical ethics literature, luck has been conspicuously absent. This book seeks to fill this void by drawing on the extensive treatments of luck by philosophers and applying them to issues in medicine and health care...the book provides a useful framework for analyzing issues in medical ethics." John R. Williams, The Heythop Journal "Dickenson's book is truly groundbreaking. By viewing issues of applied ethics through the unusual prism of moral luck, she throws an unexpected light on familiar themes in medical ethics, and by bringing the problem of moral luck into relatively unchartered areas, she goes some way in rectifying the neglect into which this important problem has fallen in recent years." Stuart Rennie, Ethical Perspectives, "Although risk is widely discussed in the medical ethics literature, luck has been conspicuously absent. This book seeks to fill this void by drawing on the extensive treatments of luck by philosophers and applying them to issues in medicine and health care â€¦the book provides a useful framework for analyzing issues in medical ethics. " John R. Williams, The Heythop Journal "Dickenson's book is truly groundbreaking. By viewing issues of applied ethics through the unusual prism of moral luck, she throws an unexpected light on familiar themes in medical ethics, and by bringing the problem of moral luck into relatively unchartered areas, she goes some way in rectifying the neglect into which this important problem has fallen in recent years." Stuart Rennie, Ethical Perspectives, & "Although risk is widely discussed in the medical ethics literature, luck has been conspicuously absent. This book seeks to fill this void by drawing on the extensive treatments of luck by philosophers and applying them to issues in medicine and health care & â€¦the book provides a useful framework for analyzing issues in medical ethics. & "John R. Williams, The Heythop Journal"Dickenson's book is truly groundbreaking. By viewing issues of applied ethics through the unusual prism of moral luck, she throws an unexpected light on familiar themes in medical ethics, and by bringing the problem of moral luck into relatively unchartered areas, she goes some way in rectifying the neglect into which this important problem has fallen in recent years."Stuart Rennie, Ethical Perspectives

Dewey Edition21

IllustratedYes

Dewey Decimal174/.2

Table Of ContentIntroduction. Chapter One: Ethics versus Luck . The myriad forms of luck. A preliminary typology of luck. Outcome luck: further considerations. Moral luck: how serious and genuine is the paradox'. Judgement from hindsight: Gauguin and Anna Karenina. Escaping from the paradox. Chapter Two: The Fragility of Virtue and the Robust Health of Kantianism. Moral luck and virtue. The fragility of goodness. Kantianism and moral luck. Chapter Three Utilitarianism and Luck in Outcomes . Actual consequences. Potential consequences. Remorse and regret. Chapter Four: Risk and Consent . The law of consent: prudent patient versus reasonable doctor. Remorse, responsibility and consent. Rationality and risk. How much is the doctor responsible for'. Chapter Five: Death and Dying. Withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment and assisted suicide. Advance directives. Chapter Six: Moral Luck and the Allocation of Health Care Resources . The 'micro level'. Knowing our limits: 'the macro level'. Chapter Seven: Reproductive Ethics: What Risks Can Women Be Asked to Bear'. Risk, contract and 'surrogacy'. Therapeutic and human cloning. Chapter Eight Psychiatry and Risk . Risk and dangerousness: luck in outcomes. Luck in character. Chapter Nine: Luck, genetics and moral character . Are genes us'. Genetics and luck in decisions to be faced. Genetics and luck in antecedent circumstances. Gauguin revisited: character, genetics and moral luck. Chapter Ten Moral Luck and Global Ethics . Towards justice and virtue: O'Neill's account. The final synthesis: global ethics and moral luck. Bibliography

SynopsisEthics is commonly assumed to be the one realm in which luck and risk do notintrude. It has been said that 'While one can be lucky in one's business, inone's married life, and in one's health, one cannot, so it is commonlyassumed, be subject to luck as far as one's moral worth is concerned.' Butalthough we do not normally hold people responsible for outcomes beyondtheir control, a serious examination of the role of luck and risk may leadus to conclude that very few outcomes are really within people's control.This is the paradox of 'moral luck'.Risk and Luck in Medical Ethics examines the 'moral luck' paradox in greaterdetail, relating it to Kantian, consequentialist, and virtue-basedapproaches to ethics. Dickenson applies the paradoxes of risk andluck to medical ethics, including timely discussion of risk and luck in theallocation of scarce health care resources, informed consent to treatment, decisions about withholding life-sustaining treatment, psychiatry, reproductive ethics, genetic testing, and medical research andevidence-based medicine.The book concludes with an examination of the relevance of risk and luck ina medical context to the study of global ethics. If risk and luck are takenseriously, it would seem to follow that we cannot develop any definite moralstandards at all, that we are doomed to moral relativism. However, Dickensonoffers strong counter-arguments to this view that enable us to think interms of universal standards for judging ethical systems. This claim hasdirect practical relevance for practitioners as well as philosophers., Ethics is commonly assumed to be the one realm in which luck and risk do not intrude. It has been said that 'While one can be lucky in one's business, in one's married life, and in one's health, one cannot, so it is commonly assumed, be subject to luck as far as one's moral worth is concerned.' But although we do not normally hold people responsible for outcomes beyond their control, a serious examination of the role of luck and risk may lead us to conclude that very few outcomes are really within people's control. This is the paradox of 'moral luck'. Risk and Luck in Medical Ethics examines the 'moral luck' paradox in greater detail, relating it to Kantian, consequentialist, and virtue-based approaches to ethics. Dickenson applies the paradoxes of risk and luck to medical ethics, including timely discussion of risk and luck in the allocation of scarce health care resources, informed consent to treatment, decisions about withholding life-sustaining treatment, psychiatry, reproductive ethics, genetic testing, and medical research and evidence-based medicine. The book concludes with an examination of the relevance of risk and luck in a medical context to the study of global ethics. If risk and luck are taken seriously, it would seem to follow that we cannot develop any definite moral standards at all, that we are doomed to moral relativism. However, Dickenson offers strong counter-arguments to this view that enable us to think in terms of universal standards for judging ethical systems. This claim has direct practical relevance for practitioners as well as philosophers., Ethics is commonly assumed to be the one realm in which luck and risk do not intrude. It has been said that 'While one can be lucky in one's business, in one's married life, and in one's health, one cannot, so it is commonly assumed, be subject to luck as far as one's moral worth is concerned.

LC Classification NumberR725.5.D533 2002