About this product

Product Identifiers

PublisherLexington Books/Fortress Academic

ISBN-100739170678

ISBN-139780739170670

eBay Product ID (ePID)112012960

Product Key Features

Number of Pages260 Pages

LanguageEnglish

Publication NamePractice, Judgment, and the Challenge of Moral and Political Disagreement : a Pragmatist Account

Publication Year2012

SubjectMovements / Pragmatism, Ethics & Moral Philosophy, General, Political

TypeTextbook

AuthorRoberto Frega

Subject AreaPhilosophy, Social Science

FormatHardcover

Dimensions

Item Height0.7 in

Item Weight19.1 Oz

Item Length9 in

Item Width6 in

Additional Product Features

Intended AudienceScholarly & Professional

LCCN2011-052669

Reviews"Frega's masterful presentation of the pragmatic alternative to traditional epistemic and transcendental accounts of rationality provides a much needed and highly accessible prescription for the renewal of moral and political life." --Larry A. Hickman, Southern Illinois University Carbondale, Frega's masterful presentation of the pragmatic alternative to traditional epistemic and transcendental accounts of rationality provides a much needed and highly accessible prescription for the renewal of moral and political life.

Dewey Edition23

Grade FromCollege Graduate Student

Dewey Decimal320.01

Table Of ContentPreface Introduction Part I. The Sources of a Pragmatist Theory of Rationality Chapter 1: Inquiry as the Logic of Practical Reasoning Chapter 2: From Reasoning to Judgment Part II. Pragmatist Rationality in Morality and Politics Chapter 3: Expressive Inquiry Chapter 4: The Public Sphere Part III. Relativism, Objectivity, and Justification Chapter 5: Pragmatism, Pluralism, and the Fact of Relativism Chapter 6: A Pragmatic Theory of Objectivity Chapter 7: Why Justification Matters? Chapter 8: Pragmatism as an Epistemology of Practice

SynopsisPractice, Judgment, and the Challenge of Moral and Political Disagreement: A Pragmatist Account offers an account of moral and political disagreement, explaining its nature and showing how we should deal with it. In so doing it strikes a middle path between troublesome dualisms such as those of realism and relativism, rationality and imagination, power and justification. To do so, the book draws on the resources of the pragmatist tradition, claiming that this tradition offers solutions that have for the most part been neglected by the contemporary debate. To prove this claim, the book provides a large account of debates within this tradition and engages its best solutions with contemporary philosophical theories such as perfectionism, critical theory, moral realism, and liberalism. The question of the nature of disagreement is addressed both at the general theoretical level and more specifically with reference to moral and political forms of disagreement. At the more general level, the book proposes a theory of practical rationality based upon the notion of rationality as inquiry. At the second, more specific, level, it aims to show that this conception can solve timely problems that relates to the nature of moral and political reasoning., The book offers an account of moral and political disagreement, explaining its nature and showing how we should deal with it. It shows how a pragmatist account will help us dealing with the most challenging kinds of moral and political disagreement and overcoming the menaces of skepticism and relativism while not relying upon illusory and unworkable ideals of reason.

LC Classification NumberJC328.2.F74 2012