|Listed in category:
This listing was ended by the seller on Fri, 29 Aug at 3:50 PM because there was an error in the listing.
WAS-661 Retro Unlacquer Alto Saxophone Mark VI Type Sax cupronickel Bell NEW
Ended
WAS-661 Retro Unlacquer Alto Saxophone Mark VI Type Sax cupronickel Bell NEW
US $799.00US $799.00
Aug 29, 15:50Aug 29, 15:50
Have one to sell?

WAS-661 Retro Unlacquer Alto Saxophone Mark VI Type Sax cupronickel Bell NEW

US $799.00
ApproximatelyS$ 1,026.56
Condition:
New
    Shipping:
    Free eBay SpeedPAK Standard.
    Located in: Beijing, China
    Delivery:
    Estimated between Mon, 15 Sep and Fri, 26 Sep to 94104
    Delivery time is estimated using our proprietary method which is based on the buyer's proximity to the item location, the shipping service selected, the seller's shipping history, and other factors. Delivery times may vary, especially during peak periods.
    Returns:
    30 days return. Buyer pays for return shipping. If you use an eBay shipping label, it will be deducted from your refund amount.
    Coverage:
    Read item description or contact seller for details. See all detailsSee all details on coverage
    (Not eligible for eBay purchase protection programmes)
    Seller assumes all responsibility for this listing.
    eBay item number:306281126543
    Last updated on Jul 22, 2025 23:31:40 SGTView all revisionsView all revisions

    Item specifics

    Condition
    New: A brand-new, unused, unopened, undamaged item in its original packaging (where packaging is ...
    Items Included
    Case
    MPN
    Does not apply
    Set Includes
    Case
    Brand
    WEIBSTER
    Type
    Alto Saxophone
    Skill Level
    Professional
    Instrument
    Saxophone
    Country/Region of Manufacture
    China
    Body Finish
    Retro Unlacquer
    Key Finish
    Retro Unlacquer
    Experience Level
    Expert
    Key
    Eb
    UPC
    Does not apply

    Item description from the seller

    About this seller

    taishan_musical

    100% positive feedback

    Joined Dec 2016

    Seller Feedback

    No feedback yet