Picture 1 of 2
Gallery
Picture 1 of 2
Have one to sell?
What Do Pictures Want?: The Lives and Loves of Images Paperback Book
US $12.98
ApproximatelyS$ 16.86
or Best Offer
Condition:
“in good condition see photos for condition”
Oops! Looks like we're having trouble connecting to our server.
Refresh your browser window to try again.
Shipping:
US $5.22 (approx S$ 6.78) USPS Media MailTM.
Located in: South Amboy, New Jersey, United States
Delivery:
Estimated between Thu, 20 Nov and Tue, 25 Nov to 94104
Returns:
30 days return. Buyer pays for return shipping. If you use an eBay shipping label, it will be deducted from your refund amount.
Coverage:
Read item description or contact seller for details. See all detailsSee all details on coverage
(Not eligible for eBay purchase protection programmes)
About this item
Seller assumes all responsibility for this listing.
eBay item number:187355700295
Item specifics
- Condition
- Good
- Seller Notes
- “in good condition see photos for condition”
- Brand
- University of Chicago Press
- Binding
- TP
- EAN
- 9780226532486
- ISBN
- 0226532488
- Book Title
- What Do Pictures Want?: The Lives and Loves of Ima
- Manufacturer
- University of Chicago Press
About this product
Product Identifiers
Publisher
University of Chicago Press
ISBN-10
0226532488
ISBN-13
9780226532486
eBay Product ID (ePID)
53733172
Product Key Features
Number of Pages
408 Pages
Publication Name
What Do Pictures Want? : the Lives and Loves of Images
Language
English
Publication Year
2006
Subject
Criticism & Theory, General
Type
Textbook
Subject Area
Literary Criticism, Art
Format
Perfect
Dimensions
Item Height
1.2 in
Item Weight
22.2 Oz
Item Length
8.9 in
Item Width
6 in
Additional Product Features
Intended Audience
Scholarly & Professional
Reviews
W.J.T. Mitchell is an important theorist, and this book is a valuable addition to the literature of iconology and visual culture., "The book displays great analytical energy, playfulness, and insight into the many varied answers that [Mitchell] offers to his own central question: images want to be kissed and touched and heard; they want to trade places with the beholder; they want everything and nothing. When Mitchell argues that critics should put the image first, he is attempting to open up the field of visual inquiry and avoid any orthodoxy of method, whether psychoanalytic or materialist, that would consider the image as mere symptom or ideological manifestation, an object of iconoclastic destruction of idolatrous esteem. The strength of What Do Pictures Want? is that it is less a manifesto on the rules and systems of analysis than a call to expand the field with ''new questions of process, affect, and the spectator position,'' a thought experiment on the vitality of images and their ability to create in the present new forms and representations of the deep past and near future, from digitized dinosaurs to cloned sheep."--Anna Siomopoulos, Afterimage, "Mitchell's book is a treasury of episodes--generally overlooked by art history and visual studies--that turn on images that 'walk by themselves' and exert their own power over the living, from the resurrection of the dinosaur in the Victorian natural-history museum, to the quasi-animated statues of Antony Gormley, to the continuing vitality of the visual stereotype of racism. His account offers the most serious challenge in many years to the view that images are merely 'signs, ' asking only for interpretation or analysis or commentary. What images want from us is much more than that."--Norman Bryson, "Artforum", The book displays great analytical energy, playfulness, and insight into the many varied answers that [Mitchell] offers to his own central question: images want to be kissed and touched and heard; they want to trade places with the beholder; they want everything and nothing. When Mitchell argues that critics should put the image first, he is attempting to open up the field of visual inquiry and avoid any orthodoxy of method, whether psychoanalytic or materialist, that would consider the image as mere symptom or ideological manifestation, an object of iconoclastic destruction of idolatrous esteem. The strength of What Do Pictures Want? is that it is less a manifesto on the rules and systems of analysis than a call to expand the field with 'new questions of process, affect, and the spectator position,' a thought experiment on the vitality of images and their ability to create in the present new forms and representations of the deep past and near future, from digitized dinosaurs to cloned sheep., "This lively collection of essays is something more than a critical tour of the problematics of contemporary art theory; it is more than a set of pertinent (or impertinent) interventions on a series of current exhibits, films, and images of all kinds; more even than a tireless and insistent reproblematization of everybody''s work on pictures, images, and image society, turning all the new ideas back into questions and more questions. It is also the elaboration of what is surely destined to become an influential new tripartite concept of the object, namely as idol, fetish, and totem."-Fredric Jameson, "This rich volume is of an 'intimate immensity'. . . sufficient to engage anyone-that is, everyone-interested in visuality under any guise at all. . . . Mitchell has a rare quality of generosity. . . . He is frequently witty, never boring, and always able to move rapidly from one sense to another (in all senses) without any self-conscious delight. This is serious stuff, regardless of its humor. . . . Among his other influential works, this one will hold a particular place, for its wide-ranging and exemplary clarity in a field often troubled by the criticisms of those who doubt the efficacy of such boundary-hopping experiments."-Mary Ann Caws, Modernism/Modernity, This rich volume is of an 'intimate immensity'. . . sufficient to engage anyone--that is, everyone--interested in visuality under any guise at all. . . . Mitchell has a rare quality of generosity. . . . He is frequently witty, never boring, and always able to move rapidly from one sense to another (in all senses) without any self-conscious delight. This is serious stuff, regardless of its humor. . . . Among his other influential works, this one will hold a particular place, for its wide-ranging and exemplary clarity in a field often troubled by the criticisms of those who doubt the efficacy of such boundary-hopping experiments., Mitchell's book is a treasury of episodes--generally overlooked by art history and visual studies--that turn on images that 'walk by themselves' and exert their own power over the living, from the resurrection of the dinosaur in the Victorian natural-history museum, to the quasi-animated statues of Antony Gormley, to the continuing vitality of the visual stereotype of racism. His account offers the most serious challenge in many years to the view that images are merely 'signs,' asking only for interpretation or analysis or commentary. What images want from us is much more than that., Mitchell's book is a treasury of episodes--generally overlooked by art history and visual studies--that turn on images that 'walk by themselves' and exert their own power over the living, from the resurrection of the dinosaur in the Victorian natural-history museum, to the quasi-animated statues of Antony Gormley, to the continuing vitality of the visual stereotype of racism. His account offers the most serious challenge in many years to the view that images are merely 'signs,' asking only for interpretation or analysis or commentary. What images want from us is much more than that., "This lively collection of essays is something more than a critical tour of the problematics of contemporary art theory; it is more than a set of pertinent (or impertinent) interventions on a series of current exhibits, films, and images of all kinds; more even than a tireless and insistent reproblematization of everybody's work on pictures, images, and image society, turning all the new ideas back into questions and more questions. It is also the elaboration of what is surely destined to become an influential new tripartite concept of the object, namely as idol, fetish, and totem."-Fredric Jameson, Mitchell's book is a treasury of episodes-generally overlooked by art history and visual studies-that turn on images that 'walk by themselves' and exert their own power over the living, from the resurrection of the dinosaur in the Victorian natural-history museum, to the quasi-animated statues of Antony Gormley, to the continuing vitality of the visual stereotype of racism. His account offers the most serious challenge in many years to the view that images are merely 'signs,' asking only for interpretation or analysis or commentary. What images want from us is much more than that., "Mitchell's book is a treasury of episodes-generally overlooked by art history and visual studies-that turn on images that 'walk by themselves' and exert their own power over the living, from the resurrection of the dinosaur in the Victorian natural-history museum, to the quasi-animated statues of Antony Gormley, to the continuing vitality of the visual stereotype of racism. His account offers the most serious challenge in many years to the view that images are merely 'signs,' asking only for interpretation or analysis or commentary. What images want from us is much more than that."-Norman Bryson, Artforum, Mitchell combines a dazzling array of theoretical discourses to develop analyses, interpretations and provocations that enable us to better understand the modalities and power of visual culture., "As the history of art history reveals, to reveal is to also conceal. So what happens when, over many years of studying pictures, you ask them what they want? You find that pictures have a whole lot to say, although interviewing them is not for the uninitiated or fainthearted because ultimately it means interviewing us and our time-honored procedures too. What fun, therefore, to have Tom Mitchell take us on this rollercoaster ride into the image itself, no longer only visual but a full-bodied intellectual experience, forthright and dazzling."-Michael Taussig, This lively collection of essays is something more than a critical tour of the problematics of contemporary art theory; it is more than a set of pertinent (or impertinent) interventions on a series of current exhibits, films, and images of all kinds; more even than a tireless and insistent reproblematization of everybody's work on pictures, images, and image society, turning all the new ideas back into questions and more questions. It is also the elaboration of what is surely destined to become an influential new tripartite concept of the object, namely as idol, fetish, and totem., This rich volume is of an 'intimate immensity'. . . sufficient to engage anyone-that is, everyone-interested in visuality under any guise at all. . . . Mitchell has a rare quality of generosity. . . . He is frequently witty, never boring, and always able to move rapidly from one sense to another (in all senses) without any self-conscious delight. This is serious stuff, regardless of its humor. . . . Among his other influential works, this one will hold a particular place, for its wide-ranging and exemplary clarity in a field often troubled by the criticisms of those who doubt the efficacy of such boundary-hopping experiments., This rich volume is of an intimate immensity'. . . sufficient to engage anyone-that is, everyone-interested in visuality under any guise at all. . . . Mitchell has a rare quality of generosity. . . . He is frequently witty, never boring, and always able to move rapidly from one sense to another (in all senses) without any self-conscious delight. This is serious stuff, regardless of its humor. . . . Among his other influential works, this one will hold a particular place, for its wide-ranging and exemplary clarity in a field often troubled by the criticisms of those who doubt the efficacy of such boundary-hopping experiments., The book displays great analytical energy, playfulness, and insight into the many varied answers that [Mitchell] offers to his own central question: images want to be kissed and touched and heard; they want to trade places with the beholder; they want everything and nothing. When Mitchell argues that critics should put the image first, he is attempting to open up the field of visual inquiry and avoid any orthodoxy of method, whether psychoanalytic or materialist, that would consider the image as mere symptom or ideological manifestation, an object of iconoclastic destruction of idolatrous esteem. The strength of What Do Pictures Want? is that it is less a manifesto on the rules and systems of analysis than a call to expand the field with 'new questions of process, affect, and the spectator position,' a thought experiment on the vitality of images and their ability to create in the present new forms and representations of the deep past and near future, from digitized dinosaurs to cloned sheep., This lively collection of essays is something more than a critical tour of the problematics of contemporary art theory; it is more than a set of pertinent (or impertinent) interventions on a series of current exhibits, films, and images of all kinds; more even than a tireless and insistent reproblematization of everybody's work on pictures, images, and image society, turning all the new ideas back into questions and more questions. It is also the elaboration of what is surely destined to become an influential new tripartite concept of the object, namely as idol, fetish, and totem., As the history of art history reveals, to reveal is to also conceal. So what happens when, over many years of studying pictures, you ask them what they want? You find that pictures have a whole lot to say, although interviewing them is not for the uninitiated or fainthearted because ultimately it means interviewing us and our time-honored procedures too. What fun, therefore, to have Tom Mitchell take us on this rollercoaster ride into the image itself, no longer only visual but a full-bodied intellectual experience, forthright and dazzling.
Dewey Edition
22
Illustrated
Yes
Dewey Decimal
701
Table Of Content
List of Illustrations Preface Acknowledgments Part One: Images 1. Vital Signs Cloning Terror 2. What Do Pictures Want? 3. Drawing Desire 4. The Surplus Value of Images Part Two: Objects 5. Founding Objects 6. Offending Images 7. Empire and Objecthood 8. Romanticism and the Life of Things 9. Totemism, Fetishism, Idolatry Part Three: Media 10. Addressing Media 11. Abstraction and Intimacy 12. What Sculpture Wants: Placing Antony Gormley 13. The Ends of American Photography: Robert Frank as National Medium 14. Living Color: Race, Stereotype, and Animation in Spike Lee's Bamboozled 15. The Work of Art in the Age of Biocybernetic Reproduction 16. Showing Seeing: A Critique of Visual Culture Index
Synopsis
Why do we have such extraordinarily powerful responses toward the images and pictures we see in everyday life? Why do we behave as if pictures were alive, possessing the power to influence us, to demand things from us, to persuade us, seduce us, or even lead us astray? According to W. J. T. Mitchell, we need to reckon with images not just as inert objects that convey meaning but as animated beings with desires, needs, appetites, demands, and drives of their own. What Do Pictures Want? explores this idea and highlights Mitchell's innovative and profoundly influential thinking on picture theory and the lives and loves of images. Ranging across the visual arts, literature, and mass media, Mitchell applies characteristically brilliant and wry analyses to Byzantine icons and cyberpunk films, racial stereotypes and public monuments, ancient idols and modern clones, offensive images and found objects, American photography and aboriginal painting. Opening new vistas in iconology and the emergent field of visual culture, he also considers the importance of Dolly the Sheep--who, as a clone, fulfills the ancient dream of creating a living image--and the destruction of the World Trade Center on 9/11, which, among other things, signifies a new and virulent form of iconoclasm. What Do Pictures Want? offers an immensely rich and suggestive account of the interplay between the visible and the readable. A work by one of our leading theorists of visual representation, it will be a touchstone for art historians, literary critics, anthropologists, and philosophers alike. "A treasury of episodes--generally overlooked by art history and visual studies--that turn on images that 'walk by themselves' and exert their own power over the living."--Norman Bryson, Artforum
LC Classification Number
N7565.M523 2006
Item description from the seller
Seller feedback (1,843)
- u***4 (488)- Feedback left by buyer.Past monthVerified purchaseThis is a very nice copy, clean and well cared for, better than the listing described. Packaging was great to protect the book and it arrived safe and quicker than expected. Price was also a good value compared to other sellers. Very pleased with this transaction and thrilled to add this to my ocean liner book collection.
- i***3 (34)- Feedback left by buyer.Past monthVerified purchaseThis is an outstanding seller very smooth transaction five stars plus *****+ all the way. Would definitely buy from this seller again. The DVD was not only as described, but like new. It was not only shipped promptly but very well packed for shipment.
- e***n (462)- Feedback left by buyer.Past 6 monthsVerified purchaseFast shipping and packaged carefully. Great seller that I would buy from again. It was as described/pictured. Great value!Fisher Price Little People THANKSGIVING Farm Turkey Bird Toy Replacement 2003 (#187070862334)