Picture 1 of 6
Gallery
Picture 1 of 6
Have one to sell?
Men’s Pennington & Bailes Pants
US $30.00
ApproximatelyS$ 38.41
Condition:
“Good; can be cut off for shorts.”
Pre-owned
An item that has been worn previously. See the seller’s listing for full details and description of any imperfections.
Oops! Looks like we're having trouble connecting to our server.
Refresh your browser window to try again.
Shipping:
US $18.95 (approx S$ 24.26) USPS Priority Mail®.
Located in: Williamsburg, Virginia, United States
Delivery:
Estimated between Wed, 16 Jul and Tue, 22 Jul to 94104
Returns:
No returns accepted.
Coverage:
Read item description or contact seller for details. See all detailsSee all details on coverage
(Not eligible for eBay purchase protection programmes)
Seller assumes all responsibility for this listing.
eBay item number:134047877543
Item specifics
- Condition
- Pre-owned
- Seller Notes
- “Good; can be cut off for shorts.”
- Brand
- Pennington & Bailes
- Size Type
- Regular
- Type
- Pants
- Department
- Men
- Size
- 34
- Inseam
- 30 in
- Color
- Orange
- Theme
- University, Auburn Tigers
- Style
- Auburn Tigers
- Material
- Cotton
Item description from the seller
Popular categories from this store
Seller feedback (89)
- a***o (70)- Feedback left by buyer.Past monthVerified purchaseNice shorts. Shipping was expensive though
- o***o (242)- Feedback left by buyer.Past monthVerified purchaseGREAT TRANSACTION
- 3***a (220)- Feedback left by buyer.Past monthVerified purchaseShipping cost was high and item was clean. But it had been washed and dried so it was not a size small more like xsmall. This should have been described and was not.
Popular categories from this store
Seller feedback (89)
- a***o (70)- Feedback left by buyer.Past monthVerified purchaseNice shorts. Shipping was expensive though
- o***o (242)- Feedback left by buyer.Past monthVerified purchaseGREAT TRANSACTION
- 3***a (220)- Feedback left by buyer.Past monthVerified purchaseShipping cost was high and item was clean. But it had been washed and dried so it was not a size small more like xsmall. This should have been described and was not.